1. Guns on Liquor Permit Premises: The last couple of e-mails have highlighted the issue of allowing a firearm on a permit premise by someone who has a conceal carry permit and is not under the influence of alcohol or consuming alcohol. Tuesday, March 1, 2011 at 1:30 in Room 116 of the Statehouse will be the fourth hearing on HB 45.
The OLBA, along with the respective associations for the Chiefs of Police and County Prosecutors, have testified in opposition to the bill. Now is the time for bar owners to offer their thoughts and input. Many permit holders have expressed concern; tomorrow is your opportunity to offer your thoughts on the legislation.
It should be noted the current law allows for a premises owner or lessee to post a sign forbidding firearms, including by CCW permit holders. This will STILL be the law if HB 45 passes.
2. Privatization: many calls have been received by the OLBA regarding reports of the State “privatizing” the distribution of spirituous liquor, particularly as private companies are already running the warehouses and making the deliveries. The OLBA, and other interested parties, continue to monitor this proposal. Based on all information we have received and gathered, it would appear that the focus is on the financial side and how to best maximize the profits that the State currently makes from the current system. To that end, we have heard no suggestions or recommendations regarding altering the law regarding distribution, pricing, number of state agencies, etc. However, to this point, nothing has been put in writing by anyone within government. Stay alert for more information.
3. Quota Exempt Permits: yet another proposal has surfaced that would allow for an increased number of quota exempt permits. As the OLBA has repeated over the years, the quota system is a central part of the control state philosophy that recognizes an oversaturation of liquor permits makes alcoholic beverages overly accessible.
The current proposal would allow a few additional counties to qualify for an entertainment or revitalization district and get an additional 10 D-5 permits for restaurants (75% of sales MUST be food). This effort is focused on the city of Warren, Trumbull County. The OLBA has been told that permit holders in the area are supportive of such a change as it will help bring business to the area and customers.
As you can see from above, issues facing the liquor permit holder never go away and generally tend to work against those currently operating! However, no matter how many meetings the OLBA has with legislative members, very few legislators indicated they have heard from liquor permit holders in their district. Please take the time to reach out to your legislator; very few will put you on the spot and ask you to spend several minutes defending your position. They may ask why you have your position and you simply need only state the reason why . . . remember, they are in Columbus to represent your position as well and the do want to hear from you.
As always, please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Here is the link to find your legislator by zip code: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/search.cfm#reps_zip